by Sonia Tagliareni
432pp (Hardcover)
My Rating: 4/10
LibraryThing Rating: 3.8/5
Goodreads Rating: 3.67/5
Book Description:
For fans of Naomi Novik and Kerri Maniscalco, “a slow-burn dark academia filled with delicious yearning, dripping with atmosphere, and a compelling mystery” (Ellis Hunter, author of Blood Bound) about a death mage who hates her magic and a poison mage who hates her that are forced to work together to stop a killer before one of them is next.
Everything about Sylas Archyr feels like a sin.
Born with the ability to speak with the dead, Viola’s magic killed her sister, Olivia, and if she doesn’t learn why, it will kill her too. Her only hope lies within the perilous walls of Gorhail Institute of Magic, where Olivia spent her final days.
There, Viola clashes with Sylas, a poison mage whose magic stems from three magical snakes. Immortal, tormented, and reckless, Sylas is tethered to a life he never asked for and haunted by guilt for his father’s death. His hatred for death mages runs deep, and he’s determined to keep Viola at a distance. But when an attack forces him to heal her, their fates become intertwined by a magical bond that threatens to upend his loyalties—and his common sense.
As more students start turning up dead, Viola and Sylas are drawn into an uneasy alliance that pulls them deeper into Gorhail’s treacherous passageways, where secrets fester beneath the stone and the dead do not rest. And as enemy lines begin to blur and their undeniable attraction grows, Viola and Sylas uncover a chilling conspiracy: someone is hunting mages for their magical relics, and if they can’t uncover the killer in time, Viola will be next.
There haven’t been many fantasy romance books that have managed to catch my eye this year, but Sonia Tagliareni’s debut novel, Deathbringer, did since its description mentioned several elements that intrigued me: dark academia, death magic, poison magic involving snakes, and enemies who discover they might not actually hate each other after all once they’re forced to work together. Furthermore, the author cited Viola as a softer heroine, which is the same type of character as some of those who have stuck with me the most (such as Phèdre from Jacqueline Carey’s Kushiel’s Legacy books, Mehr from Tasha Suri’s Empire of Sand, and Amani from Somaiya Daud’s Mirage).
Unfortunately, I didn’t think Deathbringer was a good book, but at the same time, it was entertaining enough that I actually finished it, which is more than I can say for a lot of books. It worked in the sense that I needed to read something that moved fairly quickly without being overly complex at the time due to illness, and there were promising aspects, like the murder mystery that involved digging into the story of the previous generation and the academy’s past. (It’s possible that would have made a more engaging novel.) I also liked that the House of Poison used magical snakes for both killing and healing, but that had more to do with snakes being neat and underutilized in fantasy than this system’s implementation. In general, I thought some of the ideas that went into Deathbringer had potential but ended up feeling like everything about it could have been executed so much better, especially the worldbuilding and character development.
This is one of those fantasy books that has a lot of different types of magic and explanations about how they work and differ, and it never really gelled for me. Maybe this is in part because I read it when I wasn’t feeling well, but the specifics felt like they were there because they sounded neat or served the plot rather than because they fit (like magical snake venom conveniently functioning as birth control for some reason).
In particular, I found the setting puzzling. Each chapter is preceded by a date with most of the story occurring from late November to early December 1939, which makes it feel like it’s supposed to be historical fantasy set in an alternate version of our world. Yet there is nothing that indicates this is not set in a semi-modern secondary world other than the fact that it uses a familiar calendar. Perhaps that’s just because the first book in this trilogy is somewhat limited in scope given that it’s almost completely set in the academy with just a bit of the beginning showing Viola’s hometown, but it seemed odd to me that such a basic aspect of the world was left murky. It ended up seeming like these dates were used just to show that not much time passes throughout this story’s events without putting thought into why they were being used and precisely what this meant in context of this world.
The characters also seemed to serve the plot rather than behaving like believable people. There were times they reached the right, not-so-obvious conclusion extraordinarily quickly during the course of their investigations, but then they took a long time to figure out something incredibly obvious that was waiting for a Big Reveal closer to the end. Though this was my biggest problem with the characterization, the romance also felt more like an author coaxing two people together than one that was given room to breathe and unfold naturally.
The story is narrated from the first-person present tense perspective of both main characters, Viola (who hates her death magic) and Sylas (who also hates her death magic). Their dynamic had potential for a compelling romance arc with Sylas coming to admire Viola’s heart and resolve despite his prejudice against death mages like the one who killed his mother, but it seemed too one-sided since Viola mainly seemed pushed toward Sylas because he was there, he was hot, and she didn’t really have anyone else. While there are certainly times he’s there for her, the way he vacillated between appreciating her and being unsure whether he could trust her or forgive her for something she didn’t even do came across as indecisive rather than making for an interesting situation where he was in conflict with himself—and he certainly did not seem like an equal match for Viola, who deserved better than that. Their romance is not at all a slow burn since they reach the point where they are so in love they’re ready to do anything for each other in the course of something like two to three weeks, so even aside from that, it was far too rushed for my taste.
In some ways, I feel like I should be rating Deathbringer lower than I am since I ended up feeling like it was a bit of a mess that didn’t live up to its potential once I finished it, but I also think it deserves some credit for keeping me interested enough to actually read the entire book. Although it didn’t make me want to continue the series, I leave books unfinished far more than I used to so I appreciate that the idea of magical snakes and curiosity about the past behind the murders kept me reading (even if I was disappointed in the lack of dark academic aspects and depth in the end).
My Rating: 4/10
Where I got my reading copy: ARC from the publisher.














